Web15. In Hillhouse v Stott; Freban Investments (Pty) Ltd v Itzkin; Botha v Botha 1990 (4) SA 580 (W), Leveson J stated: ". . . a Court need not be satisfied that there will be advantage to creditors, only that there is reason to believe that that will be so. That in turn, in my opinion, leads to the conclusion that the Web(see: Botha v Botha (2009) 3 SA 89 (W). 9. I am satisfied that applicant has a prima facie claim for rehabilitative maintenance on the undisputed facts laid before me. As a result, the only remaining issue is the quantum thereof. 10. Save for acknowledging receipt of an amount of R2200.00 (rental income in respect of the joint property ...
Van Schalkwyk, LN --- "Onderhoudstoekenning vir gades of …
WebFeb 26, 2024 · I must concur that the courts discretion is limited two factors already mentioned indeed the case of Botha v Botha. 30. The plaintiff argues that fairness should prevail in so far as the sharing of the joint estate. In the matter of Wijker v Wijker the proper approach was stated in determining whether an order of forfeiture should be made. It ... http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPHC/2008/169.html new city homes sold june
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND …
Web1. The appeal is dismissed with costs. 2. The cross-appeal is upheld with costs. 3. The costs shall include the costs of two counsel. 4. The order of the court below is set aside and substituted with the following: ‘The application is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel, where so employed.’. WebChapter 13: Maintenance of a spouse after divorce 161 v Botha42 the court described the purpose of rehabilitative maintenance as enabling the spouse who has been … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2024/106.pdf internet domowy play opinie